Typically
the answer to this question has fallen into two opposing camps. On one
side is the Calvinist or Reformed position and on the other side is the
Arminian position. The Calvinist position proposes an answer of "no", a
true Christian cannot lose his or her salvation whereas the Arminian
position proposes a "yes" answer to the question. Both of these
positions would be considered within the pale of orthodoxy. However,
there are people in each of these groups who would be considered of the
more "radical" adherents, that would say the opposing position is heresy.
However, throughout the history of the church either of these positions,
as long as they were not accompanied by some other recognized heretical
doctrine, was considered acceptable.
The
Calvinist position holds that God converts the soul, causes the rebirth
and transforms the nature, writing the law on the heart of the
believer, and as such, the believer cannot "unconvert" him or herself.
The believer now has a new nature and will act according to that new
nature just as an unbeliever can only act according to his or her
sinful, corrupt nature. Therefore, as a new creation, the believer will
be faithful unto the end. But what about the passages of scripture that
warn believers not to fall away, that seem to indicate a true believer
can turn away from the faith? Heb 3 and Heb 6:4-12 are perhaps the
classic passages to which most turn to make the claim that true
believers can fall away. There are others as well but these seem to be
the most significant. The Calvinist proponent tries to make the case
these passages are really addressing the "pseudo-believer" and not a
truly born again person. Additionally, some Calvinist would claim that,
even if they are addressed to true believers, God uses these kinds of
warnings to keep the true believer in the faith, as a means of sustaining or preserving grace. More about this later.
The
Arminian position would say we must
take the warnings at face value and if they appear to be issued to true
believers, we should assume the audience is the true believer and
therefore, true believers are authentically subject to falling away. Of
course, this view is built upon the foundational view of libertarian
free will that is key to the Arminian theology. And, conversely, the
Calvinist view is built on their foundational view of total depravity
and the bondage of the will. On the Arminian view, the will remains free
to simply walk away from Christ, and thus conditions could occur that
would result in a true believer walking away, committing apostasy. God
works in the life of the believer to sustain and keep the believer but
in the end, the believer has libertarian freedom and can use that
freedom to turn away from God's grace.
But,
something on which both Arminians and Calvinists agree, is that if a
true believer were to ultimately and finally reject Christ there would
be no hope for repentance per Hebrews 6:4-6. This would be the "point of
no return". Some ask if a true Christian can lose their salvation
"due to repeated disobedience". There is scriptural evidence,
specifically Heb 3, that indicates continued disobedience and rebellion,
and "the deceitfulness of sin" can lead one to unbelief and a final
rejection of Christ. But it is the final rejection of Christ that dooms
one. It's not the disobedience or even denials like Peter's three
denials, it's the unbelief. It is the rejection of Christ as our Savior
that dooms us to the judgment of God because there is no other solution for our sin (Heb 10:26) and anything left to provide reconciliation
to God! So both Arminians and Calvinists agree that to be saved, one
must continue to believe in Christ unto the end. The difference is that
Arminians believe a true believer can ultimately and finally turn away
from Christ and fall into unbelief whereas the Calvinist believes that
God will work to maintain the true believer in faith unto the end. On
Calvinism, a true believer might turn away for a time but will
ultimately return in faith.
As mentioned above, some Calvinists would claim that various warnings we see in scripture are indeed aimed at true believers. But, the warnings do not mean that a true Christian can ultimately turn away from Christ, rather they function as a means of God's grace to maintain the true Christian's faithfulness so they don't turn away. They function to help sustain saving faith. This actually assumes a Molinist understanding of God's middle knowledge. The idea here is that believers have the ability to turn away from Christ if it were not for God's sustaining activity. God knows exactly what each of us would do under any given circumstance so, in his providence, he arranges the lives of his elect in such a way that will sustain their faith. While the true believer *could* turn away, they are not being coerced against their wills or forced in any way to stay with Christ, God knows if circumstances are arranged in a given manner, they *will* not turn away from Christ. In other words, God's providence based on his omniscience, which includes middle knowledge as described, is the method he uses to sustain and preserve his elect in faith without violating their free agency. This is the position I hold. I am reformed in my theological position but adopt Molinism as the *way* God ensures his purposes are achieved without violating human freedom. And, using his middle knowledge, he sustains and preserves his elect in faith unto the end.
As mentioned above, some Calvinists would claim that various warnings we see in scripture are indeed aimed at true believers. But, the warnings do not mean that a true Christian can ultimately turn away from Christ, rather they function as a means of God's grace to maintain the true Christian's faithfulness so they don't turn away. They function to help sustain saving faith. This actually assumes a Molinist understanding of God's middle knowledge. The idea here is that believers have the ability to turn away from Christ if it were not for God's sustaining activity. God knows exactly what each of us would do under any given circumstance so, in his providence, he arranges the lives of his elect in such a way that will sustain their faith. While the true believer *could* turn away, they are not being coerced against their wills or forced in any way to stay with Christ, God knows if circumstances are arranged in a given manner, they *will* not turn away from Christ. In other words, God's providence based on his omniscience, which includes middle knowledge as described, is the method he uses to sustain and preserve his elect in faith without violating their free agency. This is the position I hold. I am reformed in my theological position but adopt Molinism as the *way* God ensures his purposes are achieved without violating human freedom. And, using his middle knowledge, he sustains and preserves his elect in faith unto the end.
In
summary, the key points on which most all agree are: 1) one must
continue believing in Christ until the end. When Peter asked Jesus how
many times he should forgive someone who wronged him, he assumed Jesus
might say as many as 7 times! That would be generous for sure. But Jesus
said 70 times 7! In other words, there is no limit to forgiveness for
those who come back to Christ in repentance and faith. And 2) the only
way to lose one's salvation is to finally reject Christ, to simply turn
away from him and never return. As long as you are trusting Christ,
asking him for forgiveness for your sin and disobedience, you are by
definition in faith.
No comments:
Post a Comment