This is a question I received with my response.
QUESTION-
I would like to know what your position is on the doctrine of original
sin and how we are guilty of Adam's sin. I think that Adam's fallen and
sinful nature has been transmitted to
us, just as a virus that manifests itself and inevitably takes over like
a zombie virus or vampirism. So it would be impossible to fight against
it, unless some force outside of us frees us from this curse. I do not
see that we are guilty of sin until the moment
we sin, but we are bound to sin as having the virus of sin, at some
point it will manifest. So I don't see that we are guilty of birth, but
heirs of a nature with the incubated virus. but that does not make us
sinners until the moment we actually commit sin,
only at that moment are we guilty and responsible for what we practice. I
see that unless someone dies as a newborn, they will sin. I would like
to know your thoughts on this.
RESPONSE-
Your question is
a good one! The doctrine of Original Sin is an important doctrine in
the history of the Christian faith. However, there is substantial
variety in the understanding of the doctrine by the
major Christian denominations, and in fact, the doctrine is not even
universally held. The underlying assumption that seems to be present in
your question and analogy of virus transmission, is the understanding of
imputed sin nature. As you state in your question,
"I think that Adam's fallen and sinful nature has been transmitted to
us, just as a virus that manifests itself and inevitably takes over like
a zombie virus or vampirism." This understanding is akin (although not
identical) to the view historically held by
many in Western Christianity whereby we inherit the sin nature from
Adam's commission of the first sin in the Garden as well as Adam's guilt
for his sin. In this view, most prominently proposed by Augustine,
humanity cannot not sin, it is inevitable.
This is similar to your view I think, although you disavow the personal
guilt aspect. Additionally, Augustine would have been favorable toward
your virus analogy as he felt that original sin was passed along
biologically. However, in Eastern Christianity, a
"softer" view prevails whereas the doctrine is seen more along the lines
of our environment that has been tainted. Adam and Eve sinned, thereby
tainting our environment, and to some degree our nature in that now we
experience death, creating a context that
we inherit in which we are now more likely to commit personal sin. In
Eastern Orthodoxy, one would say that we all inherit the consequences of
Adam's sin, but not the personal guilt.
It is important
to note that this doctrine is not typically considered a core or
essential doctrine, meaning it is not required to believe in the
doctrine or a particular version of the doctrine, to be
considered a Christian. This is an in-house debate that is important,
but not essential to the core gospel. What is core to the gospel is that
"all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Rom 3:23) and
"... there is no one righteous, not even one"
(Rom 3:10). But the idea of the human race inheriting the original sin
and guilt of Adam in some fashion is not an essential.
Dr. William Lane Craig has
written and spoken fairly extensively on this topic. I particularly
commend his "Defender Series"/Doctrine of Man on the topic to you and
one of his answers to a previous "Question of the
Week" - links to both are below. May God bless you richly Luis and thank
you for reaching out!
https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/original-sin/
